http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/?pg=fullstory&id=5670&status=True
I would rather ride in a team structured and run like Slipstream, but could it be possible that Michael Ball forcing the rules (including supporting the law suit from Kale Leogrande vs USADA) is doing more to change cycling than Jonathan Vaughters is in creating tougher rules within his team? In a way Slipstream is simply putting in a structure outside the system while Ball could ultimately be doing more to change the system it's self.

Kale Leogrande returning to racing after being sidelined by a bad case of root fungus.

0 comments:
Post a Comment